Explaining Shahnameh characters' actions on social dilemmas with emphasis on the rational choice theory

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

a

10.29252/kavosh.2024.20865.3505

Abstract

On a social dilemma, the actor faces a conflict between two options: non-cooperative (seeking immediate self interest) and cooperative (seeking collective interest or long-term self interest through collective interest). The pros and cons of each way must be evaluated to make a rational choice. This research aims at explaining the characters' actions on social dilemmas in Shahnameh based on the rational choice theory and using a descriptive-analytical method. The results show that in Shahnameh, characters have been on a social dilemma whether or not to give yes/no response to children's marriage proposal, to send or not to send hostages and to save one's life or protect the country in the battlefield. Evaluating the consequences, they chose the most advantageous option for themselves and the community. Therefore, actors' rational choice has been of the cooperative type and their choice has been an interest-oriented one. Their decision-making rule is both the rule of maximum such that the king of Yemen, Afrasiab, and Rostam determined the worst consequences of each option and then opt the best option among the worst, and the expected benefit rule such that on the dilemma of Zal and Roudabeh wedding, Sam chose the consequence with the maximum expected interest.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Books
Aidenlou, S. (2011). Daftare- Khosravan, Sokhan. [in Persian]
de Fouchécour, C. H. (2002). Heroic ethics and formal ethics in Ferdowsi's Shahnameh. Brave Body and Wise Soul (New studies on Shahnameh) (S. Meskoob, Ed.), Tarh-e Nou. [in Persian]
Farasatkhah, M. (2015). We Iranians: Historical and social exploration of Iranian peoples moods, Nashr-e Ney. [in Persian]
Ferdowsi, A. (2005). Ferdowsi's Shahnameh (S. Hamidian, Ed.), Ghatreh. [in Persian]
Hamidian, S. (2004). An Introduction to Ferdowsi Thought and Art, Nahid. [in Persian]
Islami Nadushan, M.  (1969). Life and death of heroes in Shahnameh, National Art Association. [in Persian]
Islami Nadushan, M.  (2011). The story of stories: Rostam and Esfandiar in Shahnameh, Enteshar Company. [in Persian]
Islami Nadushan, M. (2004). Four Spokespersons of Iranian Conscience: Ferdowsi, Mawlavi, Saadi, and Hafiz, Ghatreh .[in Persian]
Jamalzadeh, M. (2016). We Iranians' moods, Arash. [in Persian]
Kezzazi, M. (1991). Secret labyrinths: Essays in Shahnameh, Nashr-e-Markaz. [in Persian]
Khaleghi Motlagh, J. (2002). Ancient words, Afkar. [in Persian]
Koyaji, J. K. (1992). Research on Shahnameh (J. Dostkhah, Ed.), Zenderoud. [in Persian] 
Little, D. (2009). Explanation in social sciences: an introduction to the philosophy of sociology (A. Soroush, Trans.), Serat. [in Persian]
Mousavi, S. K., & Khosravi, A. (2010). The link between wisdom and myth in Shahnameh, Elmifarhangi. [in Persian] 
Naraghi, H. (2013). Some points on the sociology of our society, Ketab-e Ameh. [in Persian]
Ranjbar, A. (1984). Ferdowsi's Intellectual Attractions, Amirkabir. [in Persian]
Rastegar Fasaei, M. (2002). Ferdowsi and Iranians' National Identity (Proceedings about Ferdowsi's Shahnameh), Tarh-e Nou. [in Persian]
Reza, F. (1971). A look at the Shahnameh, Huge tree of Khorasan, National Art Association. [in Persian]
Rezaei Dashtarzhaneh, M. (2013). The glory of wisdom in Ferdowsi's Shahnameh; Analytical evaluation of the actions of characters in the measure of wisdom, Elmifarhangi. [in Persian]
Rezagholi, A. (1998). Sociology of autocracy: sociological analysis of Zahhak the Snake Shoulder, Nashr-e Ney. [in Persian]
Rocher, G. (1988). Social action (H. Zanjanizadeh, Trans.), Mashad University. [in Persian]
Safa, Z. (2005). Epic writing in Iran from the oldest historical era to the 4th century of the Hijri, Amirkabir. [in Persian]
 Zarinkoub, A. (2004). Namvarnameh: About Ferdowsi and Shahnemeh, Sokhan. [in Persian]
Journals
Fouladiyan, M., & Rezaeebahrabad, H. (2019). Sociological Analysis of Iranian's Egocentricity (Based on an Empirical Study in Tehran). Journal of Culture-Communication Studies19(44), 1-26. doi: 10.22083/jccs.2018.109170.2308 [in Persian]
Ghaneirad, M. (2000). Iranian individualism and underdevelopment. Political & Economic Ettelaat, 14(151-152), 34-43. [in Persian]
Hajiannezhad, A. (2005). The wise and the unwise in Shahnameh. Journal of Literature and Human Sciences (University of Tehran), 56(173), 125-143. [in Persian]
Javadi Yeganeh, M. (2008). Sociological approach of rational choice theory. Culture Strategy, 3, 33-64. [in Persian]
Javadi Yeganeh, M., & Hashemi, S. Z. (2005). The conflict of self interest and collective interest (social dilemma) and factors affecting it. Journal of Social sciences Letter, 26(26), 141-171. [in Persian]
Javadi Yeganeh, M., & Hashemi, S. Z. (2008). The Challenge of Individualism and Collectivism in Sociology. Journal of Social sciences Letter, 16(1), 131-161. [in Persian]
Parham, B. (1991). Fundamentals and functions of Shahriyari in Shahnameh and their importance to measuring political wisdom. Iran-nameh, 37, 98-121. [in Persian]
Ramezani kheradmardi, H., Ahmadi, H., & Zakarian Amiri, M. (2020). The motivation of actors in public policy; a new look at self - interest in public choice theory. Iranian Journal of Public Policy6(3), 131-144. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2021.79495 [in Persian]